Blog Archives
Nitrogen Reduction Incentive Act
Thank you to those who responded to last week’s poll question whether via the poll or contacting me via email or phone. The poll results are shared on my blog site.
Nitrogen Reduction Incentive Act (NiRIA): With high input prices, one opportunity to reduce costs is to become more efficient with nitrogen fertilizer applications. (Information from this article comes from the NiRIA Program website, guidance documents, and UNL CropWatch). Established under LB 1368 (2024), NiRIA is a state program that offers payments to producers who reduce their nitrogen fertilizer application rates by the lesser of 40 pounds per acre or 15% of their baseline rate. The program is available to corn, sugarbeet, wheat and potato producers statewide, with total funding for 2026 capped at $1 million.
Producers who successfully participated in the 2025 program may enroll again if reductions are on different fields. Administration and funding of NiRIA are done through the partnerships of the Nebraska Department of Water, Energy, and Environment (DWEE), local Natural Resources Districts (NRDs), and the Nebraska Corn Board.
Each participant will need to identify the practice(s)/product(s) they plan to implement to achieve the 40 lb N or 15% reduction of N per acre. Practices/products are subjected to individual NRD approval:
- Reduction in nitrogen application
- Implementation of in-season sensor-based technology
- Implementation of a nitrogen stabilizer
- Implementation of a biological product
- Implementation of other technology utilizing nitrogen timing and/or rate
Applications due to local NRDs by Nov. 15, 2025, with approvals announced by Dec. 15, 2025. Payments range from $10 to $15 per acre, depending on your priority area (A, B or C). Each NRD manages application approval and prioritization based on available funding. Contact your local NRD for assistance in determining your priority area and for submission details. NiRIA program information, application form, and NRD’s point of contact can be found on the NDEE website.
Nebraska On-Farm Research conducted in the York/Seward and surrounding county area has found the following regarding the various practices shared in the options above.
- Nitrification Inhibitor: Only one study (which used ATS as the inhibitor with 32%) in 22 site-years-worth of studies found a positive yield increase when using nitrification inhibitors (mostly with anhydrous) in heavier textured soils. Minimal savings in N leaching was found.
- Rate and Timing: No yield difference when applying N pre-plant vs. split application. No yield differences when nitrogen was applied +/- 50 lb N/ac vs. the grower rate. (7 site-years)
- Pivot Bio: Across 64 replications, 27% of studies showed a 5 bu/ac or greater yield increase, 17% showed a 5 bu/ac or greater yield decrease, and 56% of studies were within 5 bu/ac.
- In-Season Sensor-based technology using Sentinel Ag: average of 57 lb N/ac of nitrogen savings between grower and Sentinel treatments in 2023 and 42 lb N/ac over 17 site-years (2023-2024) without significant yield differences. It can be used with fertigation and/or sidedress applications in both irrigated and non-irrigated acres.
Poll results from 9/29/25: What’s the 1-2 main reasons holding you back from trying technology like: Fertigation and/or In-Season Plant Sensing Technologies like Sentinel Ag? (11 responses)
Anonymous: I have not fertigated because I utilize ydrop application. I’m not opposed to fertigating, it is just 1 more certification we have to obtain on an already certificate happy society. Ydrop application definitely has its downfalls though like time for extra passes, more hours on a machine, not very fun to apply, labor and most likely limited to just 1 pass. Have not had much experience w plant sensing technology and have always questioned its accuracy, especially on the go at a high speed. Fertilizer is a pretty important pass, would hate to not get it right. Usually when you see signs of shortages it’s too late.
Anonymous: Available time to do fertigation.
Anonymous: I often ask this same question if we are trying to be more efficient and we have the data to back it why are we allowed to put so much pre plant fertility out the data shows less applied more times = efficient
Anonymous: My side dressing works well.
Anonymous: I already fertigate all corn 1 time per season. It’s hard to find time with water needs, weather, crop stage, getting fertilizer to the pivots etc to do numerous passes.
Anonymous: Cost Not sure it fits my farm
Anonymous: Fertigation is an “upper level” management practice. Many farmers do not have the time, education, or experience it takes to fertigate correctly and safely. There is expense involved with the permit and the equipment involved. (Example: The gasket in my chemigation valve had a small crack from age so it did not pass inspection by NRD. A new valve was over $900 plus the labor and time to replace it!) Plant sensing technologies come with an expense and a learning curve also.
Anonymous: 32% is more expensive than anhydrous Cost of equipment and management of fertilizing with numerous pivots
Anonymous: time, labor
Anonymous: Trusting that the technologies actually work and give consistent results.
Anonymous: Lack the knowledge to do this.
JenREES 3/7/21
Farm Bill ARC-IC: Unless one has a field that tends to get hit with lower yields compared to county average every year, I’m unsure that ARC-IC is a fit for many farmers in this part of the State. For the 2021 decision, one would need to expect 2021 yield to be significantly less than county average yields. So if your field(s) are typically near or above county average yields, it’s perhaps not the wisest decision.
Lawn Care: The beautiful weather is a great opportunity to rake lawns, remove leaves from lawns, and dormant overseed grass in thin spots. Dormant seeding provides an opportunity for seed to grow when soil temperatures warm and spring rains come. Prepare areas to overseed by hand raking small areas to remove dead growth and loosen the soil surface. Large areas can be heavily aerated. It’s best to only power rake if there’s a thatch layer of ½” or more present. Overseed Kentucky bluegrass at 1-2 lbs/1000 square feet and tall fescue at 4-6 lbs/1000 square feet. Also, it’s too early to apply fertilizer and herbicides to lawns.
Solar Electric Questions: Will share more regarding a free webinar series next week to be held from Mar. 30-Apr. 8. If you have specific solar-related questions right now, please direct them to John Hay, Nebraska Extension Educator at 402-472-0408 or jhay2@unl.edu.
Nitrogen Rate and Timing Studies: An article written by Dr. Charlie Wortmann and colleagues shared, “Partial Factor Productivity (PFP) is commonly expressed as yield per unit input, e.g. bushels of corn per pound of fertilizer N applied (bu/lb N). PFP can be adapted to units of nutrient removed in grain harvest to units of nutrient applied, such as corn N harvested relative to fertilizer N applied (PFPN, lb/lb).” Advances in corn genetics and changes in farmers’ management practices have resulted in more pounds of grain produced for every pound of nitrogen applied. Dr. Richard Ferguson shared, “The average PFP of fertilizer N for corn in Nebraska was estimated to average 1.16 bu/lb N in 2012 compared to 0.57 bu/lb N in 1965. This represents a doubling in PFP for fertilizer N applied to corn. The trend of increase was linear from 1965 to 2012. Assuming a grain N concentration of 1.2% at 84.5% dry wt. or 0.67 lb N/bu, the PFPN converts to 0.79 lb of grain N per lb of fertilizer N applied in 2012 compared with 0.38 lb/lb in 1965.” That’s quite an increase in nitrogen use efficiency!
Another way farmers have been looking to increase nitrogen use efficiency is to compare nitrogen rates and timing of the fertilizer applications. We’ve had some on-farm research studies recently look at sidedress applications using either the UNL equation/Maize N model or industry models such as Climate Field View and Granular. In all these studies, the recommended rate was compared to rates that were at least 30 or 50 pounds over and under the recommended rate. In 2020, there were two nitrogen rate and timing studies in the area partially sponsored by the UBBNRD. A York County study found no yield differences between applications of spring anhydrous of 135, 185, and 235 lbs/ac. The same farmer also did a nitrogen rate X timing study in Hamilton County. He compared Fall vs. Spring vs. Split application rates of anhydrous + UAN of 205 vs. 255 lb/ac for each timing. There were no yield differences with any of the timings and rates. Take homes: In none of the studies did the addition of 30-50 lbs N/ac above the recommended rate increase the yield statistically. A few of these studies also compared side-dress applications vs. pre-plant alone. One situation resulted in a statistically lower yield with pre-plant alone while the others resulted in no yield differences. I’ve compiled these results in a table at http://jenreesources.com.
These nitrogen rate and timing studies could provide farmers a way to assess for their own operations. I’ve mentioned the precision nutrient management studies (https://go.unl.edu/4rvw) for several months. If you weren’t sure if it could apply to your situation, I was told that those don’t have to be precision nutrient applied. So, if you’re interested, please let me know and we can work out the details. There is a $1300 stipend for that specific study. There’s also up to $300 reimbursement from UBBNRD for water quality related studies. I’m currently working through on-farm research protocols for 2021. If you have a production and/or product-related question you want to test on your own farm, please contact me or your local Extension educator and we’d be happy to help you set up a study!
*Note: End of column for newspapers.*
*For mobile devices, please scroll left-right to read the first table below.*
| Year | County/ Irrigation | Pre-Plant | In-Season Rate/ Yield | In-Season Rate/ Yield | In-Season Rate/ Yield | In-Season Rate/ Yield | Other |
| 2015 | Dodge (Maize N model) | 12 lb N/ac MAP (fall) 80 lb N/ac 32% UAN at plant | 70 lb N/ac 222 bu/ac | 100 lb N/ac 220 bu/ac | |||
| 2015 | Dodge (Maize N model) | 12 lb N/ac MAP (fall) 80 lb N/ac 32% UAN at plant | 70 lb N/ac 221 bu/ac | 100 lb N/ac 221 bu/ac | |||
| 2016 | Dodge Rainfed (Climate Field View) | 78 lb N as 32% UAN in April | 30 lb N/ac as 32%+10%ATS (SD) 224 bu/ac | 60 lb N/ac as 32%+10%ATS (SD) 226 bu/ac | 90 lb N/ac as 32%+10% ATS (SD) 239 bu/ac | ||
| 2016 | Dodge Non-irrigated (Climate Field View) | 78 lb N as 32% UAN in April | 35 lb N/ac as 32%+10%ATS (SD) 196 bu/ac | 65 lb N/ac as 32%+10% ATS (SD) 201 bu/ac | 95 lb N/ac as 32%+10%ATS (SD) 201 bu/ac | ||
| 2016 | Dodge Pivot | 70 lb N/ac as NH3 | 110 lb N/ac 247 bu/ac | 140 lb N/ac 250 bu/ac | 170 lb N/ac 249 bu/ac | ||
| 2017 | Dodge Pivot (4″) | 70 lb N as 32% UAN Spring | 110 lb N/ac 32% (SD) 239 bu/ac | 140 lb N/ac 32% (SD) 243 bu/ac | 170 lb N/ac 32% (SD) 251 bu/ac | 210 lb N/ac 32% Spring Pre-plant 216 bu/ac* | |
| 2017 | Saunders Non-irrigated | 100 lb N/ac as 32% UAN Spring | 40 lb N/ac 32% (SD) 195 bu/ac | 40 lb N/ac 32%+Humic acid (SD) 199 bu/ac | 75 lb N/ac 32% (SD) 200 bu/ac | 140 lb N/ac 32% Spring Pre-Plant 193 bu/ac | |
| 2017 | Saunders Non-irrigated | 100 lb N/ac as 32% UAN Spring | 40 lb N/ac 32% (SD) 183 bu/ac | 40 lb N/ac 32%+Humic acid (SD) 183 bu/ac | 75 lb N/ac 32% (SD) 185 bu/ac | 140 lb N/ac 32% Spring Pre-Plant 185 bu/ac | |
| 2018 | Gage Non-irrigated | 150 lb N as 32% UAN in April. Rye cover crop. | 0 lb N/ac as AMS (SD) 137 bu/ac* | 50 lb N/ac as AMS (SD) 161 bu/ac | 100lb N/ac as AMS (SD) 151 bu/ac | ||
| 2018 | Franklin Pivot (4″) | None. Cover crop mix | 0 lb N/ac as Urea broadcast 210 bu/ac* | 100 lb N/ac as Urea broadcast 254 bu/ac | 175 lb N/ac as Urea broadcast 272 bu/ac | 250 lb N/ac as Urea broadcast 275 bu/ac |
2020 York Spring Anhydrous Nitrogen Rate on Corn
This study essentially showed what the previous studies had: that less nitrogen can be applied without hurting yield or net return. This study is sponsored in part by the UBBNRD.
| Pre-Plant | In-season | lbs N/bu grain | Yield | Marginal Net Return |
| 110 lb N/ac spring NH3 (March) | 25 lb N/ac as UAN May | 0.73 C | 184 A | $599.14 A |
| 160 lb N/ac spring NH3 (March) | 25 lb N/ac as UAN May | 0.98 B | 189 A | $600.38 A |
| 210 lb N/ac spring NH3 (March) | 25 lb N/ac as UAN May | 1.23 A | 191 A | $594.88 A |
2020 Hamilton County Evaluating Nitrogen Rate and Timing on Corn
This study showed no difference in nitrogen timing nor rate on yield and showed less nitrogen can be applied without impacting yield. For reference, the UNL economical N recommendation for this field was 232 lb/ac N if applied in the fall, 190 lb/ac N if applied in the spring, and 156 lb/ac N if split applied. With a lbs N/bu grain of 1.0 or greater, it would be interesting to see this study conducted again using lower nitrogen rates. Soil samples down to 6 feet were taken by the farmer and the results did not find leaching in any treatments in this study. This study is sponsored in part by the UBBNRD.
| Pre-Plant | In-season | lbs N/bu grain | Yield | Marginal Net Return |
| 180 lb N/ac Fall NH3 | 25 lb N/ac as UAN May | 1.03 B | 199 A | $629.85 A |
| 230 lb N/ac Fall NH3 | 25 lb N/ac as UAN May | 1.27 A | 201 A | $625.49 A |
| 180 lb N/ac Spring NH3 | 25 lb N/ac as UAN May | 1.02 B | 201 A | $638.30 A |
| 230 lb N/ac Spring NH3 | 25 lb N/ac as UAN May | 1.24 A | 206 A | $641.70 A |
| 120 lb/ac N Spring NH3 | 25 lb N/ac as UAN May 60 lb N/ac side-dress V8 | 1.00 B | 205 A | $645.69 A |
| 170 lb/ac N Spring NH3 | 25 lb N/ac as UAN May 60 lb N/ac side-dress V8 | 1.24 A | 206 A | $633.50 A |
